The good news: teachers desperately want quality technology professional development. The bad news: many still aren’t receiving options for high quality, ongoing professional development. ISTE Coaching Standard 1d asks coaches to “implement strategies for initiating and sustaining technology innovations and manage the change process in schools and classrooms” (Iste.org, 2017). As I considered this particular substandard, I immediately focused in on the initiating and sustaining wording. The combination of initiating and sustaining is critical to the success of technology PD.
– INITIATING –
Needs-based PD
Just as students have a wide variety of needs, so do teachers. One way to identify the needs of teachers is by creating technology PD that is customized. Prior to planning PD, surveys can be a valuable tool in determining teacher needs. Using a combination of closed and open-ended questions, “Try to ascertain which members of your teaching staff need training on specific technology tools or techniques and determine which are comfortable using technology but need more help integrating it into instruction” (Roland, 2015). PD sessions can then be targeted based on staff interest and ability. PD sessions can also be “self-contained so that teachers can choose to attend workshops only in the areas where they need extra learning” (Roland, 2013).
The technology coach at my former school did a wonderful job of hosting PD that was teacher-driven and needs-based. Workshops for new tools were leveled for beginner, intermediate, and advanced learners. Other workshops were created after polling staff to identify needs and interests. By avoiding a one-size-fits-all approach, he was able to effectively implement technology innovation in our district.
Constructivist PD
All PD walks a fine line between theoretical and practical. Quality technology PD should begin with a solid presentation or discussion of WHY this particular tool, device, or method is a good fit for meeting the needs of learners. Once a theoretical basis exists for using the technology, teachers need the opportunity to familiarize themselves with the technology while under the guidance of an experienced peer or coach.
This critical shift in how PD occurs can be described as dissemination versus implementation. Teachers need the opportunity within a PD session to work directly with the new tool or method being introduced. This can be accomplished through a learning environment “where we see demonstrations, engage in simulations, have time to practice new technique with expectations of ongoing support and collaborative reflection and sharing” (Kelly Young as cited in Ferlazzo, 2015).
– SUSTAINING –
PD as a Cycle
Similar to the shift from dissemination to implementation is the idea that PD should very much be a cycle of inquiry where teachers are exposed to new ideas, allowed the opportunity to practice the concepts learned at the PD, discuss what worked and what didn’t with an experienced coach or peer, and set new goals based on that conversation. This cycle is necessary because “the process of improving teaching and learning is not often smooth or instantly successful” (Foltos, 2013).
Sean McComb, a National Teacher of the Year, believes that once-and-done PD is rarely effective. McComb advocates a three-part approach to successful PD: give teachers choice, make the content relevant and job-embedded, and don’t limit exposure to a single session. Successful and sustainable change requires that teachers “learn about a way to improve, have the opportunity to plan and implement, and then reflect and adjust, ideally in company and collaboration with colleagues or a coach” (McComb as cited in Ferlazzo, 2015).
Take and Go PD
Best practice when providing PD for teachers is to include take-home resources which can be either digital or paper. These materials might include “online tutorials, help sheets or short videos [which] will allow [teachers] to review the training on their own if they do forget how to do something” (Roland, 2015). It is also best practice to provide contact information so that attendees know how to reach the presenter should they have any questions.
Teacher and technology coach, Craig Badura, has taken the idea of distributing materials to a new level with his gamification-like
App Task Challenges. The Challenges involve short and simple directions to walk teachers through the process of using a new app or aspect of an app. Badura explains, “I have to have teachers get their hands dirty while they’re learning a new tool, so to speak, but they have to have that assurance that I’m going to help them clean up when they get done if they need that help during that time” (as cited in Gonzalez, 2016).
– CONCLUSION –
As coaches and peer leaders consider the aspects of technology professional development which will lead to best results for teachers and students, hopefully, we will begin to see an emphasis on both sides of the tech PD equation: initiating and sustaining. Without the sustaining piece, even the best initiation will not be successful long-term.
SourcesFoltos, L. (2013).
Peer coaching (1st ed.). Corwin.
Gonzalez, J. (2016). How to Plan Outstanding Tech Training for Your Teachers | Cult of Pedagogy. Retrieved from https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/tech-training-for-teachers/
Iste.org. (2017). ISTE Standards For Coaches. [online] Available at: https://www.iste.org/standards/for-coaches [Accessed 6 Oct. 2018].
Roland, J. (2015). Empowering teachers to implement technology-driven educational programs. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=569
I was struck by your perception that the tech coach at your school was effective because their PD was teacher-driven and needs-based. I would be fascinated to learn how their work aligned with the ideas that PD is “Needs based” “Constructivist” “Cyclical” and “Take and Go” Those feel like powerful attributes of effective professional learning, but it would be great to see how those ideas align with what you has been successful for you.
Hi Lauren,
I love the focus of your post. Initiating and sustaining jumped out to me as well. One part of your post that really stuck with me was about customizing PD to teacher needs. I believe when PD is personalized to some extent it becomes way more powerful for those teachers. I recently went a PD for more training for our new SMARTboards, the first thing our coach/instructor asked was to share any burning questions/concerns. After people digitally shared the coach then made sure to address every question that was asked. It helped me and other teachers to really understand.
Keep up the great work.
-Kelsey
Lauren, I appreciated your two-pronged approach to professional development. It makes sense to me that gathering information about learning needs prior to attending a professional development session would be rather effective. I can’t say I’ve ever actually experienced this but it would be refreshing to know that the trainer would have that level of input beforehand. I also agree that learning in continuous and that a one-and-done approach to training is not impactful. Thank your for sharing these thoughts!